Today, a look at princes and non-primogenitive inheritance.
SUCCESSION
Much has been made, over the centuries, of Salic Law, not least Title LIX, Concerning Private Property, which addressed the prohibition of feminine inheritance: of Salic land no portion of the inheritance shall come to a woman: but the whole inheritance of the land shall come to the male sex. Looming far larger at the time of the Merovingian dynasty, however, was the division of inheritance—a habit, at the royal level, which led to the perceived degeneration of Clovis’ descendants and their power.
Clovis’ decision to divide his kingdom in the manner of a patrimony, rather than to enact the now-familiar practice of primogeniture, has fascinated and frustrated historians and scholars for generations. However, at the time, such an action was commonplace and unexceptional—and, of course, led to the notorious wars and factions so much a part of the dynastic history of the time. The problem is another more applied by modern perspective than one which would have been recognized at the time. As the sun comes up in the east, so the tradition was the tradition, and if it contained inconveniences, and even the seeds of strife, that was not the matter for a father (nor even a king) to presume to rectify. Primogeniture was not merely foreign, it would have been inconceivable, in the sense of not occurring to those with estates. If it obviously became conceivable to those inheriting, then the actions were as they were, and were as much accepted consequences as the tradition itself was accepted.
THEODORIC
454-526; King of the Ostrogoths (488-526), ruler of Italy (493-526), and regent of the Visigoths (511-526). The name means king of the people (theud), and may be tied to a form of rulership referred to in ancient Germanic nations as Thiudans, a spiritual level of authority in contrast with reiks, the military or blood ruler. This name, of course, unites those aspects.
Theodoric made much of his (possibly fictional) descent from the venerated Amal line, and varied his approach to Clovis and others with their value or threat to his position. His queen, Audofleda, was Clovis’ sister; though the alliance forged by this marriage was not made of stern stuff. Theodoric and Clovis, though they never warred directly, remained wary and at times antagonistic regardless of the relation.
THEUDERIC
484-533/534(?); inherited Austrasia, Rheims, and Metz. First son of Clovis, whose mother was unrecorded but seems likely to have been a concubine/friedelehe. Little is recorded of him before his father’s death, and there is no indication whatever that he was in any way unhealthy. His “palsy” in this story serves both as story arc for his character and also as the physical manifestation of unspoken conflict between Clovis and himself. Much of what I have created for Theuderic’s character is utter fiction.
Early in his own reign, Theuderic sent his son Theudebert to battle the Scandinavian King Chlochilaich (better known, from the poem Beowulf, as Hygelac) who had invaded his realm. Theudebert defeated and killed Chlochilaich. See the note on Theodoric for etymology of the name. (Variations: Thierry, Deitrich)
As always, Author's Notes excerpts are excerpted from the MS, which means they are written "in-universe." These posts should not be taken as historical resources.
Sunday, July 27, 2014
Author's Notes
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment