Such as the assumption that the unidentified denizens of the past who created ancient art must have been men. Not so, says NatGeo, as they take another look at cave paintings from across a wide swath of the globe.
There has been a male bias in the literature for a long time. People have made a lot of unwarranted assumptions about who made these things, and why.
--Dean Snow
Image: National Geographic For more, go here |
It's stimulating when we find useful ways to question ourselves. Even the possibility (even the likelihood) that we may come up with the wrong answers doesn't devalue the importance of ASKING ... and of reviewing even the most "obvious" of our assumptions ...
As a side note, just within the past two weeks I was reading about finger length ratio, having jumped off of the article about the vena amoris, and I am an example of the unusual feminine trait: my ring fingers are notably longer than my forefingers. Apparently, I'm quite the manly woman. Erm.
(Bonus question: is Dr. Manning's name ironic ... ?)
2 comments:
Your atypical index:ring ratio may be genetic.
It isn't a tiny little rack-like device with which I stretched the little buggers out, that's for sure. :)
Post a Comment